/challenge weapon

Status: 
Accepted

A request from Sargo, a player.

/challenge <weapon of choice>

Ex: /challenge disruptor

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
this has been accepted

this has been accepted already

Crazy Assassin
Offline
Joined: 05/13/2010
Derp

Derp

This is what I get for saying I'll forward requests...

Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
how does sargo not know

how does sargo not know that?

he has been on nox forums in the lmd section alot it seems, someone else said that and I posted that in response :)

guess it really is a great idea xD

anyway, would rather see extra requests from players than none at all :P

Euclid
Offline
Joined: 05/23/2010
you are just a man of the

you are just a man of the people aren't you?

Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
Because I listen to what the

Because I listen to what the players on my server think?

Maybe you should try opening your eyes to more than yourself sometime euc.

Euclid
Offline
Joined: 05/23/2010
no, it's just annoying how in

no, it's just annoying how in every post you seem to mention the need for PLAYERS OVER ADMINS

WE GET IT

I GET IT

you don't have to mention it all the fucking time

and i don't see where you get that i only care about myself when all the servers ive been admin for have been more player-oriented than any server around today

Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
rage more? No where above did

rage more?

No where above did I mention that.

Unless you mean the part when I said he should have saw that in the nox lmd section. or the "would like to see more player requests" part.

Neither of which I am saying that, more like saying its good that players are getting involved.

iMp
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2010
idiot

you just proved euclid's point xD.

RoboPhred
Offline
Joined: 05/06/2010
Weapon duels have been
Status: Pending»Accepted

Weapon duels have been accepted, but not restricting their weapon.
Anyway, I will keep this in mind if I ever get around to adding weapon duels.

I want to clean up the profession code first (hopefully without screwing it up this time), but this will probably be priority 2.