Anyone still alive?

15 replies [Last post]
May 10, 2011 - 5:39pm
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010

Anyone here still breathing? or is it just me

Top
May 10, 2011 - 6:56pm
#1
iMp
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2010
bleh

well i come around and check sometimes, but is less worth it if the developer isn't much of active, i myself been somehow distracted with stalax now that is open source lal.

Top
May 12, 2011 - 11:30am
#2
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
hmm stalax...I've not heard

hmm stalax...I've not heard of it until now, I found this site, but it seems to be a very simple mod...

what is it like?

Top
May 31, 2011 - 8:03pm
#3
Petzi
Offline
Joined: 05/31/2010
Stalax still lives? That's

Stalax still lives? That's good to hear. Anyway, my answer is the same as iMp. I think we should keep updating the wiki, though. <a href="http://nox.me/lugorwiki/index.php/Main_Page" title="http://nox.me/lugorwiki/index.php/Main_Page">http://nox.me/lugorwiki/index.php/Main_Page</a>

Top
June 1, 2011 - 9:06pm
#4
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
ya I've been meaning to try

ya I've been meaning to try to find time to start updating stuff

Top
June 21, 2011 - 12:15pm
#5
woosie
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
are there even any proper

are there even any proper servers left?

Top
June 23, 2011 - 4:18am
#6
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
define proper lol

define proper lol

Top
June 23, 2011 - 7:12am
#7
woosie
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
no incapable admins, stupid

no incapable admins, stupid rules, bad maps or a combination of those

Top
June 23, 2011 - 11:02pm
#8
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
then no, cuz everyone has

then no, cuz everyone has some sort of incapable admin or some sort of bad map.

Those 2 are mostly unavoidable, some admin will slip in that looks good and then turn out bad, and maps are at the liking of the maker, so to each his/her own there

Top
June 24, 2011 - 4:40pm
#9
Euclid
Offline
Joined: 05/23/2010
no, map quality is completely

no, map quality is completely objective

Top
June 25, 2011 - 12:43am
#10
Doby
Offline
Joined: 05/18/2010
There are still a number of

There are still a number of active servers, none of them 'proper' or else inactive.

^ was the last 'proper' server i guess

Top
June 26, 2011 - 9:04pm
#11
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
not really, since the idea of

@Euclid not really, since the idea of quality changes from person to person.

As proved in the past, things that you find bad, I can find good, and vice-versa.

As for the last proper server, by the definition above there never has been one lol.

Top
June 27, 2011 - 1:28pm
#12
iMp
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2010
lol

If it's lugormod, is not really a 'proper' server ;). at the end 80% of jka players left are essential mindfucked idiots.

Top
June 30, 2011 - 3:12pm
#13
Euclid
Offline
Joined: 05/23/2010
lol

Siebe wrote:
@Euclid not really, since the idea of quality changes from person to person.

As proved in the past, things that you find bad, I can find good, and vice-versa.

As for the last proper server, by the definition above there never has been one lol.

taste is subjective, quality is not

Top
July 2, 2011 - 2:10am
#14
Siebe
Offline
Joined: 05/26/2010
lol

But, taste is how people judge maps.

For example, a map can be built really well, with no lags, no FPS draining areas, and no building bugs.
However, that map could be boring as fuck with nothing fun to do on it. Which makes it a Bad Map.

Then there could be a map with a shitload of fun things, tons of things to do, but it lags to fuck and everyone gets like 10 FPS on it, which also makes it a Bad Map.

A good map ideally balances fun and playability, making sure that the FPS from the cool things doesn't go down too much that it affects gameplay, nor that the map has bugs that cause it to crash or otherwise.

Now defining those features on a map that make it "good" or "bad" are completely up to the person judging it. Which is what he was referring to in his post.

Now what you mean with the building, you mean the way the map was built, as in the ents used, and the way the map works, is its quality, which you are right isn't subjective

What I was referring to earlier was the "good" or "bad" that was refrenced earlier in the thread. ( I shouldn't have used the word quality )

also, forgive the shitty spelling at parts here, had to type fast and with injured hand.

Top
July 4, 2011 - 6:25pm
#15
Matt
Offline
Joined: 05/23/2010
oh no! We are so sorry about

oh no! We are so sorry about your injured hand!

Also.
Let's sign this site to the "top 10 dropped projects" contest.

Top